Scarlet Letter :: essays research papers

Controversy between Money and Loveas shown in The Rocking-Horse achiever The Rocking-Horse Winner is couched in the symbols of the ancient myths. The mother is poor, unsatisfied milksop princess who yearns for happiness Paul is the gallant knight on horse-back who rides to her rescue (Junkins 261). The mythical aspect of the bill is evident in the style and symbols. In the opening lines, the first seven words deliver a fable-like quality reminiscent of any number of fairy princess tales, yet the word advantages locates us in the atmosphere of the modern world, so does the word luck (Junkins 261). The reach of the symbolism is overwhelming, in some sense the falsehood is about its literal, narrative level the life of the family that chooses money instead of some more stable value, takes money as its nexus of affection. The first respite lay with the mother (Snodgrass 117).There was a beautiful woman who started with all the advantages, yet she had no luck. She married for love, and the love turned to dust. She had bonny children, yet she mat up they had been thrust upon her, and she could not love them (Lawrence 1). The story continues to tell us of Hester, who is unable to love her children and is obsessed with money. Only she herself knew that at the center of her heart was a unvoiced little place that could not feel love, no, not for anybody.(Lawrence 1) There were many problems in the household, one of which was a lack of love from the mother. As Lawrence wrote Only she herself and her children themselves, knew it was not so. They read it in each others eyes (Lawrence 1). During a conversation, Pauls mother mentions that luck is, what causes you to have money. If youre lucky you have money. Thats why its better to be born lucky than rich. If youre rich you may loose your money. But if youre lucky you leave behind always get more Forbes 2money.(Lawrence 1). The situation is then made worse by assuming that her misfortunes were caused by her marriage to an unlucky husband. The father is intelligibly a failure as a provider and family-head, so much that we are scarcely conscious of his existence. And his failure is aggravated by the high loving dress the family tries to maintain (Koban 280). Lawrence tells us the mother had a small income, and the father had a small income, but not nearly enough for the social position which they had to keep up.